Jonathan Foulkes <j...@jonathanfoulkes.com> writes: > Hi Dave, a special thanks to you for all the cheerleading and pushing you do > on this topic. > >> I hope that your marketing campaign is being successful on these >> fronts. It has always been my goal to "enable better products", but >> not have the headache of making them myself, where 99.99% of the >> effort is (like in cerowrt), in making everything else "just work" and >> be reliable enough to ship. > > I haven’t ramped up the marketing in a big way yet, but what I am > doing is quite effective (e.g. click through metrics are 5 to 10x the > norm); what’s been most astonishing is the word of mouth spread. > > Yes, lots of effort in having a reliable, supportable product. > > As you can see from the site, my messaging has been focused on regular > end users, using terminology they can hopefully grasp (I get accused > of both being too technical and not technical enough, so maybe I got > it right ;-) > > One area of messaging that I believe members of this list could > provide input on is around how to get people to understand that > ‘speed’ (line capacity) is not everything. I keep looking for ways to > address that and wrote a short post on it: > http://evenroute.com/the-last-50-feet/quick-vs-fast
Well, there's Stuart's classic rant from two decades ago (which is on the technical side): http://www.stuartcheshire.org/rants/Latency.html On the less technical side, there's this video from the RITE project: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1a-eMF9xdY And this one that nicely showcases latency, but then draws the wrong conclusion (that you need more bandwidth to fix it): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fNp37zFn9Q -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat