> On 27 Nov, 2018, at 10:54 am, Pete Heist <p...@heistp.net> wrote:
> 
> …any reason that fq_codel or Cake would be an improvement over sfq 
> specifically for some "noisy links” (loose translation from Czech) in a 
> backhaul that have some loss but also experience saturation.

If the random loss is low enough that saturation can be achieved, then adding 
AQM will be beneficial in the usual way.  Also, it will not interfere in those 
cases where saturation is not achieved (for whatever reason).

 - Jonathan Morton

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to