Pete Heist <p...@heistp.net> wrote:
> I was asked a related question by my local WISP, who wanted to know if
> there would be any reason that fq_codel or Cake would be an improvement
> over sfq specifically for some "noisy links” (loose translation from
> Czech) in a backhaul that have some loss but also experienceIf the drops are due to noise, then I don't think it will help. The congestion signals should already getting made. But, there are lots of cases where there is excessive buffers at the edge of the backhaul, which is encouraging excessive traffic and thus congestion. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
