Well, I'm concerned about the delay experienced by people when they surf the web... flow completion time, which relates not only to the delay of packets as they are sent from A to B, but also the utilization.
Cheers, Michael > On 27 Nov 2018, at 11:50, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Luca Muscariello wrote: > >> link fully utilized is defined as Q>0 unless you don't include the packet >> currently being transmitted. I do, so the TXtteer is never idle. But that's >> a detail. > > As someone who works with moving packets, it's perplexing to me to interact > with transport peeps who seem enormously focused on "goodput". My personal > opinion is that most people would be better off with 80% of their available > bandwidth being in use without any noticable buffer induced delay, as opposed > to the transport protocol doing its damndest to fill up the link to 100% and > sometimes failing and inducing delay instead. > > Could someone perhaps comment on the thinking in the transport protocol > design "crowd" when it comes to this? > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
