Luca Muscariello <luca.muscarie...@gmail.com> writes: > This procedure would allow to size FQ_codel but also SFQ. > It would be interesting to compare the two under this buffer sizing. > It would also be interesting to compare another mechanism that we have > mentioned during the defense > which is AFD + a sparse flow queue. Which is, BTW, already available in > Cisco nexus switches for data centres.
One think I wondered about afterwards was whether or not it would be feasible (as in, easy to add, or maybe even supported in current versions) to tie in an AQM to an AFD-type virtual fairness queueing system? You could keep the AQM state variables along with the per-flow state and react appropriately. Any reason why this wouldn't work? -Toke _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
