On Sun, 26 Mar 2023, Sebastian Moeller via Bloat wrote:

The point of the thread is that we still do not treat digital communications 
infrastructure as life support critical.

        Well, let's keep things in perspective, unlike power, water (fresh and 
waste), and often gas, communications infrastructure is mostly not critical 
yet. But I agree that we are clearly on a path in that direction, so it is time 
to look at that from a different perspective.
        Personally, I am a big fan of putting the access network into communal 
hands, as these guys already do a decent job with other critical infrastructure 
(see list above, plus roads) and I see a PtP fiber access network terminating 
in some CO-like locations a viable way to allow ISPs to compete in the internet 
service field all the while using the communally build access network for a 
few. IIRC this is how Amsterdam organized its FTTH roll-out. Just as POTS 
wiring has beed essentially unchanged for decades, I estimate that current 
fiber access lines would also last for decades requiring no active component 
changes in the field, making them candidates for communal management. (With all 
my love for communal ownership and maintenance, these typically are not very 
nimble and hence best when we talk about life times of decades).

This is happening in some places (the town where I live is doing such a rollout), but the incumbant ISPs are fighting this and in many states have gotten laws created that prohibit towns from building such systems.

David Lang
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

Reply via email to