On 08/28/2012 02:45 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.08.2012 15:31, Gary Martin wrote:
On 08/28/2012 02:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.08.2012 15:01, Gary Martin wrote:
Bootstrap - licensed under the APLv2 License
What is the APLv2 License? You don't have to copy typos from the
Bootstrap authors. :)
It's "the Apache License, version 2", same as for Bloodhound.
-- Brane
Heh.. sorry. My typo.
The typo appears in Bootstrap's GitHub logs related to their LICENSE
file. The file itself appears to be the original ALv2 as published on
the Apache site. Haven't run a diff, though; it might not be too bad an
idea to do that.
-- Brane
Oh, well, I didn't check to see if they had also made that mistake.. I
am only saying that I did not copy the mistake from them as I was
avoiding writing the whole thing out. I will try to be more careful in
future.
Other than that, I assume that Bootstrap's typo do not cause us any
problem. From a quick look around the download, they sometimes only
mentioning http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt but there are
cases of mentioning Apache License v2.0 and Apache License, version 2.0.
I cannot see their intent being questioned here but, as we are committed
to attempting to get as close to perfection as possible with our
compliance with any licensing issues, I am happy to take some time to
look at this further if necessary.
Anyway, I think I may as well make the changes I mentioned at the
beginning of the thread (hopefully without any more typos) and see what
happens.
Cheers,
Gary
