On 08/03/2012 09:26 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Aug 3, 2012 4:15 AM, "Olemis Lang" <[email protected]> wrote:
...
NOTICE , LICENSE and other files will only need to
mention that file (<= I'm hoping we can do that).
There is no need for these files to refer to a proposed TRAC_VERSION
file. It is sufficient to state "portions developed by..." (as they do
now).
I said so in order to say something like this in e.g. NOTICE file .
"A modified copy of Trac is included in this source release package.
Exact version of Trac may be found in TRAC_VERSION file" ... etc , etc
Ooooh... I like that! +1
Cheers,
-g
Given that this was liked...
At the moment the NOTICE file states:
Trac - licensed under the BSD License
This product include software (Trac) developed by
Edgewall Software (http://trac.edgewall.org/)
Are we happy with fixing the typo in the above and appending the
following to the trac section of the NOTICE file:
A modified copy of Trac is included in this source
release package. The exact version of Trac may be
found in the trac/TRAC_VERSION file.
It might also be nice for the bootstrap part of the NOTICE file to be
consistent with the rest - I think it should read:
Bootstrap - licensed under the APLv2 License
This product includes software (bootstrap) developed by
Twitter (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/)
to specify the license we understand it to use more carefully.
Cheers,
Gary
