On 19/09/12 19:38, Olemis Lang wrote:
On 9/19/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
Interesting. In that case, I will suggest that we always attach patches
to tickets and refer to them as you have done here. For the smallest of
patches, you can also choose to paste the text directly into an email -
or indeed into a ticket comment as I did recently for #204. I will put
this into a wiki page shortly.

As for the patch, it looks like good work to me. Unless anyone else
notices any problems I expect to commit it a bit later tonight.

hmmm ... I'm hoping any of my previous comments be considered . IMO we
shall not remove pagination . AFAICR there's an option for that ...

AFAICR in #80 I submitted a patch (... pending or already committed I
don't recall now ...) adding options to render Bootstrap pagination in
reports web page and built-in smaller pagination in widgets
(considering Joachim's suggestion ;) . Maybe we can follow a bit
further and parameterize page index visibility in query and report
widgets on top of the work made in there ...

Well, it is entirely possible that I have missed the scope over which these changes apply. Do we have widgets where a change of page updates the content of the widget itself? If this is the case, I would expect to keep the pagination. If it is not the case, I would not expect us to enhance the widgets to do that quite yet and so I would consider removing the pagination, reverting once there is the need again (code is never really lost after all). On the other hand, perhaps there is some use for pagination that I have not considered.

Whichever way these things turn out, I will delay applying the patch for the moment to investigate further.

Cheers,
    Gary

Reply via email to