On 25.10.2012 04:52, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 10/24/12, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jure and I have been looking at the datamodel to see what would it take to >> implement some of the enhancements that we have in mind. >> Here are a couple of observations that pop up: >> >> 1. Parent/child relationships are not model by permanent ids but by names >> (like version, milestone, product... name) that can be changed by user >> through admin interface. A bit unusual but simple and eliminates the need >> for joins when no additional data from the other entity is needed. >> > This is what Trac-dev should be working towards regarding relations of > any kind between resources . > > http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/TracRelations
That page was last updated 4 years ago. Are you seriously suggesting that referring this question to trac-dev@ will, after all this time, have any measurable effect? There comes a point when you'll have to face the fact that Trac hasn't exactly been a hotbed of innovation and new developments recently. Which, I understand, happens to be one of the reasons for the existence of Bloodhound in the first place. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
