On 25.10.2012 09:02, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 10/24/12, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 25.10.2012 04:52, Olemis Lang wrote: >>> On 10/24/12, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >>> This is what Trac-dev should be working towards regarding relations of >>> any kind between resources . >>> >>> http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/Proposals/TracRelations >> That page was last updated 4 years ago. Are you seriously suggesting >> that referring this question to trac-dev@ will, after all this time, >> have any measurable effect? >> > yes , there are recent conversations where it was cited , especially > regarding post-Trac 1.0 schedule . Indeed multi-project proposal [1]_ > is another example , last updated 3 y ago , and there's some recent > work on that direction [2]_ . It's worth to mention that target t-h.o > plugin seems to be intended to be incorporated into Trac at a given > time in the future . The spec is also the starting point (and > inspiration) for our own initial approach towards multi-product > support .
I think it's a better approach to just implement these things the way they should be done, then propose patches to trac-dev. The other way around is going to take forever. I won't describe the headache I got when I tried to reconcile the TracRelations proposal with relational data modelling principles, or abstraction layering principles. -- Brane -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
