Have never seen this report before so I am not sure what the expectations are but from the reminder email I am guessing that at least some level of historical perspective is needed for a well written one.
I am willing to help or contribute to this anyway I can. Where can I look for old reports? Peter On 3 December 2012 11:42, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting.. I was thinking of doing the report this time but it is > always interesting to get a new view. > > I assume that we will have officially released 0.3 by the end of the day > but I do not know whether we consider ourselves to have effectively > established the frequent release cycle yet. Also, do we feel that we have > gone any way towards lowering the barriers to entry & development? How have > the new committers found this area? > > I don't think that we can claim to have significantly improved the > community diversity at this stage. > > Anyway, whoever is going to do the report, I suggest that the addition of > three new committers is referred to, along with the releases up to 0.3.0. > Also I would probably mention that we have gone some way to mitigating the > problems identified in the September report by working with the developers > of some of our dependencies to make sure that code is available through > pypi. > > Cheers, > Gary > > > On 03/12/12 10:30, Joachim Dreimann wrote: > >> Past reports have usually been written by either Gary or me, does any of >> the newer contributors want to have a go at this? The deadline is in two >> days (Wednesday 5th). >> I'll be happy to assist with editing. >> >> For inspiration, our two most recent reports can be found here: >> http://wiki.apache.org/**incubator/September2012<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2012> >> http://wiki.apache.org/**incubator/June2012<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2012> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 1 December 2012 15:26, Marvin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Dear podling, >>> >>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache >>> Incubator PMC. >>> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your >>> quarterly >>> board report. >>> >>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 December 2012, 10:00:00 PST. >>> The report >>> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The >>> Incubator PMC >>> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting, to >>> allow >>> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Dec 5th). >>> >>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator >>> PMC, >>> and >>> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest >>> you >>> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> The Apache Incubator PMC >>> >>> Submitting your Report >>> ---------------------- >>> >>> Your report should contain the following: >>> >>> * Your project name >>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of >>> the >>> project >>> or necessarily of its field >>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move >>> towards >>> graduation. >>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be >>> aware of >>> * How has the community developed since the last report >>> * How has the project developed since the last report. >>> >>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/**incubator/December2012<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2012> >>> >>> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this >>> page is >>> created from a template. >>> >>> Mentors >>> ------- >>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on >>> the >>> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the >>> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator >>> PMC. >>> >>> Incubator PMC >>> >>> >>> >> >
