On 12/4/12, Gary Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/12/12 22:54, Olemis Lang wrote: >> On 12/3/12, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> For point 3 ... >> [...] >> >> btw , will we release a new version in December ? > > I am certainly hoping that we will. >
good ! :) >> >>> For point 2, from personal experience, it is not that bad. Setup was >>> fairly >>> straightforward but I did miss some documentation on software >>> design/architecture and such. Actually Trac's are good enough and maybe >>> we >>> should simply point to read-worthy pieces and add some of our own for BH >>> code. >>> >> two suggestions : >> >> 1. add the wiki page in #139 to i.a.o > > It would naturally go in on release of 0.4. ok > I suppose we could have a > section in the wiki for upcoming documentation or the documentation of > upcoming features. > Interesting . Maybe that's what BEP are for , but if there is a need for something different than that , I think it's ok . >> 2. mention the work we started on BEPs as a means to gather >> community consensus and eventually also being a reference, >> and documentation of major changes . > > So to meet this suggestion I could append something like the following > to the final paragraph: > > Along these lines, the project has added a number of enhancement proposal > pages to the wiki that are intended to reflect the decisions made on the > project's dev mailing list, reducing the need to be aware of all previous > discussion for newcomers. > "One such proposal documents how the community will work on tickets submitted to the issue tracker. As a consequence in a few minutes new contributors will understand our workflow and the reasons we considered to install it ." ... more or less ... please improve . ;) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article:
