Agree, it seems this has been addressed at least partly. I have also decreased priority for #151.
What remains is: o #256: AFAICT this should be closed and a new normal priority ticket opened? o #273: Waiting for Trac ML? o #308: Not assigned! o #156: Waiting for Apache Infra, does this really deserve "critical" priority? o #279: Not assigned! o #291: Not assigned! o #293: Assigned to Gary as I have questions for him. Is this really "critical"? Peter On 10 December 2012 19:22, Joachim Dreimann <[email protected]>wrote: > Of the 10 highest priority tickets, 6 are still 'new', ie not being looked > at / worked on. They are up to 5 months old: > > > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needinfo&status=needinfo(new)&status=needinfo(review)&status=new&status=review&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component&order=priority > > Either the ticket priority doesn't reflect their importance or we're not > tackling the issues deemed most important. > > Please let's make a conscious effort to improve this either way! :-) > > Cheers, > Joe > > -- > Joe Dreimann > UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> > * > * > *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN > HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> * >
