On 18 December 2012 08:32, Peter Koželj <[email protected]> wrote: > Agree, it seems this has been addressed at least partly. > I have also decreased priority for #151. > > What remains is: > o #256: AFAICT this should be closed and a new normal priority ticket > opened? >
I don't know, what action is even left? As I understood Greg's comment on the mailing list we don't need to remove minified Trac files. > o #273: Waiting for Trac ML? > o #308: Not assigned! > As I understand Ryan's latest comment this doesn't require any further action from us other than importing trac 1.0.1 in the future. > o #156: Waiting for Apache Infra, does this really deserve "critical" > priority? > I would argue that yes, it's critical for improving our development environment. It's also worrying that we haven't had movement on this in four months, and the ticket is almost six months old. I've brought this up in the #asfinfra channel today, see below: 12:45 pctony: jdreimann: it is something we can do yes, but it is now blocked on the storage I am trying to fix right now. 12:52 pctony: Sorry. 12:53 jdreimann: pctony: That's okay, I'm really just hoping to get this moving again since we've made no progress in so long. 12:53 pctony: jdreimann: we will as soon as I sort the storage This may make progress soon, although he's struggling with a FreeNAS upgrade at the moment (the storage he referred to). > o #279: Not assigned! > Classed as a starter tickets. Should we make a decision to not class critical/blocker issues starter tickets? Maybe that gets it some attention sooner. > o #291: Not assigned! o #293: Assigned to Gary as I have questions for him. Is this really > "critical"? > Gary as replied it seems. - Joe > > Peter > > On 10 December 2012 19:22, Joachim Dreimann > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Of the 10 highest priority tickets, 6 are still 'new', ie not being > looked > > at / worked on. They are up to 5 months old: > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needinfo&status=needinfo(new)&status=needinfo(review)&status=new&status=review&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component&order=priority > > > > Either the ticket priority doesn't reflect their importance or we're not > > tackling the issues deemed most important. > > > > Please let's make a conscious effort to improve this either way! :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Joe > > > > -- > > Joe Dreimann > > UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> > > * > > * > > *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN > > HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> * > > > -- Joe Dreimann UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/> * * *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *
