On 13.03.2013 15:20, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.03.2013 09:31, Olemis Lang wrote: >> On 3/13/13, Jure Zitnik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 3/13/13 8:58 AM, Olemis Lang wrote: >>> >>>> -0 ... I'd suggest (?:(?!\d)\w+) ... which is already available in >>>> multiproduct.util.IDENTIFIER after recent patches . >>> Sure, we can go with that one too ... >>> >> things like Hønsdrükḱenshàpełlmünçen (i.e. unicode chars ;) will be >> supported , which is nice to have ; and will be matched by TracLinks >> expressions >> ;) > I very much disagree with using something like that as the tag that is > effectively a unique key in database columns. Display name is different, > but for database debugging, I really don't want to have to tell the > difference between i and í and ì and ı.
Not to mention that those 4 variants of i have 6 different Unicode representations. You do *not* want to deal with Unicode normalization issues in primary keys. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
