On 3/13/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Greg Stein <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2013 1:33 PM, "Ryan Ollos" <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > > If we go this route and wish to keep milestone "Release X" aligned with > version "X",
I'd say it'd be nice to have this match this convention ... but not terribly bad to forget it in the sense of jumping from m:R<n> to m:R<n+3> even though the gap might look a bit awkward . > which I hope we do for the sake of sanity, then I'll need Gary > (or anyone else BATCH_MODIFY privileges) @rjollos : btw , I apologize for the rain of messages resulting from my actions when u requested scheduling closed tickets in the appropriate milestones . That's related to this very same subject . > Batch > modify will avoid having to change 35 tickets one-at-a-time, which also > would result in 35 messages being sent to bloodhound-commits, and I'm sure > no one wants that. > I'm sure I was included in the list ... ;) > I have felt that it would be less confusing to just call this release 0.5.1 > and have it correspond to the "Release 5" milestone so that we don't have > to move tickets, but that's as much opinion as I have on the matter. > + -- Regards, Olemis.
