Many thanks indeed! I'll try to scan the import for any gross errors.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 10:24 PM Oliver Stueker <oliver.stue...@mun.ca> wrote: > Happy Holidays everyone, > > As discussed a couple of weeks ago, I have today imported the 50 > repositories from the WWMM and CML users/teams on Bitbucket into the Blue > Obelisk GitHub-org (https://github.com/BlueObelisk; I apologize for the > flood of emails that I have probably triggered by that). > > Within the BlueObelisk-org, I've also created the teams CML and WWMM and > assigned the repos to those teams based on their location on Bitbucket. > > Could someone with higher privileges than myself within the BlueObelisk > GH-org add Mark (mjw99) and Peter (petermr) as members, please? > I can then add them to the teams, making them maintainers of the > respective repos. > > Next week I'll start experimenting with enabling CI on some select repos > (using Travis or even the new GitHub Actions - let's see what works better) > and fixing the markup in the Jumbo-Converters Wiki ( > https://github.com/BlueObelisk/jumbo-converters/wiki). > > Cheers, > Oliver > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:09 AM Peter Murray-Rust <pm...@cam.ac.uk> > wrote: > >> Many Many thanks Oliver, >> If/when we start using the Github repo, suggest we copy any key mails OR >> links to to the blue-obelisk discuss list. >> >> It might make sense to see if we could shift blue-obelisk to NumFocus. >> This is a non-profit fiscal sponsor who can apply for funding . I have had >> dealing with them before - it turned out ContentMine wasn't eligible as it >> was already a company. If you look at the successful projects then Blue >> Obelisk would be (just) in scope for biosciences I think. >> >> On the other hand we've done fine with zero-cash for over 15 years! >> >> P. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 1:40 PM Oliver Stueker <oliver.stue...@mun.ca> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks everyone, >>> >>> Yes, maintaining history was always my plan. I have already (locally) >>> cloned all hg-repositories in question using git-remote-hg ( >>> https://github.com/felipec/git-remote-hg) and have them as git >>> repositories that contain the whole history. >>> I've been using git-remote-hg for quite a while now and it's working so >>> well that I never had to bother learning to work with hg directly. >>> >>> Thanks also for inviting me to BlueObelisk on GitHub. >>> >>> Most repositories are now ready to be pushed directly to GitHub once >>> stubs have been created there. >>> The jumbo-converters repo seems to contain at least one (zip) file that >>> is larger than 100M somewhere in its history (probably containing gaussian >>> log files) and pushing to GH is therefore rejected. I should be able to >>> filter them out. >>> >>> >>> Deprecating the old repositories and leaving a redirection to the new >>> location might be more difficult as this will require access to the wwmm >>> and cml accounts on Bitbucket. >>> Peter mentioned in our call that he doesn't remember the passwords for >>> them but that they are likely "user" accounts and not "Teams" where several >>> users could have "owner" or "manager" privileges. >>> @Mark: do you maybe remember more? >>> >>> In any case: the Mercurial repos will be deleted by Bitbucket on June 1, >>> 2020. >>> If we can't regain access to the Bitbucket hg-repositories, I can add a >>> statement to the README.md files of each repo that says, e.g.: >>> >>> NOTE: >>> As of Janurary 1st, 2020 https://github.com/BlueObelisk/jumbo-converters >>> is the new offical repository. >>> This repository was previously hosted at: >>> https://bitbucket.org/wwmm/jumbo-converters >>> >>> If someone still has at least push-access to the old repositories, we >>> can push this message there as well -- or once the hg-repos have been >>> deleted, create new repos at Bitbucket with the same name that just contain >>> this message. >>> However in my own Bitbucket repositories I don't see any functionality >>> that correspronds to GitHubs: "Archive this repository -- Mark this >>> repository as archived and read-only." >>> >>> Oliver >>> >>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 08:05, Mark Williamson <mw...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 17/12/2019 02:06, Oliver Stueker wrote: >>>>> > Dear All (especially Egon and Henry), >>>>> > >>>>> > I'd really like to hear your opinion (in favor or against) adding >>>>> these >>>>> > WWMM and CML source-code repositories to >>>>> https://github.com/BlueObelisk. >>>>> >>>>> Hello Oliver, >>>>> >>>>> Sounds fine to me; just make sure that it is clear that the old repos >>>>> are deprecated and that there is some kind of forwarding message to >>>>> the >>>>> new repos. Also, try to maintain history with something like hg-git in >>>>> migration. I'll try and help in any way, time permitting; my github id >>>>> is mjw99. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>> >>>> -- "I always retain copyright in my papers, and nothing in any contract I sign with any publisher will override that fact. You should do the same". Peter Murray-Rust Reader Emeritus in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dept. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069
_______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list Blueobelisk-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
