Yes it is. Thanks good catch. Obviously it's an easy fix, but I want to write a test to see what this behavior has on the system when tables are disabled. I have a group that are experiencing issues on table disable/remove, out of memory issues. I'm wondering if this is related.
Thanks! Aaron On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan < [email protected]> wrote: > CacheValueBufferPool.java > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=blob;f=blur-store/src/main/java/org/apache/blur/store/blockcache_v2/CacheValueBufferPool.java;h=968edab4f58373aba50eeaa277cc673e1fde57d3;hb=HEAD > > Line:70 > > BlockingQueue<CacheValue> blockingQueue = > _cacheValuePool.get(_cacheValuePool); > > Should it not be > > BlockingQueue<CacheValue> blockingQueue = > _cacheValuePool.get(cacheBlockSize); > > > -- > Ravi >
