We did not experience OOM etc... But a dramatic slowdown of query exec times especially on cold starts via CacheIndexInput. May be other issues could also be related to this as you've pointed out
On Thursday, 5 February 2015, Aaron McCurry <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes it is. Thanks good catch. Obviously it's an easy fix, but I want to > write a test to see what this behavior has on the system when tables are > disabled. I have a group that are experiencing issues on table > disable/remove, out of memory issues. I'm wondering if this is related. > > Thanks! > > Aaron > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > CacheValueBufferPool.java > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-blur.git;a=blob;f=blur-store/src/main/java/org/apache/blur/store/blockcache_v2/CacheValueBufferPool.java;h=968edab4f58373aba50eeaa277cc673e1fde57d3;hb=HEAD > > > > Line:70 > > > > BlockingQueue<CacheValue> blockingQueue = > > _cacheValuePool.get(_cacheValuePool); > > > > Should it not be > > > > BlockingQueue<CacheValue> blockingQueue = > > _cacheValuePool.get(cacheBlockSize); > > > > > > -- > > Ravi > > >
