Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-03-23 18.04:
Voilà. SC members, feel free to vote again, or shout (but for the very
last time).
thanks a lot for managing this, and for your patience. +1 to the policy.
Just one small thing: Legally, marks do currently *not* belong to TDF,
as TDF does not exist. They legally belong to OOoDeV, but I would waive
the necessity to mention that until either OOoDeV has renamed itself
(the annual meeting will decide on that in April), or TDF legally exists.
Another mark: Maybe we should add a version and/or a date to the TM
policy, so we know which version people refer to. Like "TM policy as of
2011-03-29"
And then a note: Google has locked our two marks for use in advertising,
so I hope this will limit the amount of fraudulent sites. Anyone seeking
permission to use these marks in advertising can also contact the legal@
alias and we can decide on exceptions. I want things to be as easy as
possible.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org>
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
