Hi André, 2011/7/13 André Schnabel <andre.schna...@gmx.net>: > I fully agree with Italo here. The discussion here at the list (and even you > comment right now) is focused on the legal implications and what the SC > would think of it. Your wording for the agenda item is much broader and > requests a general decision on the screenshots independent from possible > legal implications.
I've actually worded the issue into the real questions coming to the fore from past discussions. The motion is clear and could be resolved easily and unambiguously. > For agenda item 2: a very basic rule for questions to the SC should be that > the question should be crystal clear and not be changed half a day before > the SC's decision. At the moment I don't even know anymore what the actual > question is. The real question is basically what I've submitted as the motion for discussion. And it does reflect the two choices that seem to have been voiced in past ML threads. I'm perplexed. ;-) -- David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
