On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:28 AM, David Emmerich Jourdain <jourd...@gmx.de> wrote: > > IMHO, I don't see why can we not adopt this option. The current MC proved > that was (and is) impartial and deeply focused on meritocracy, essential > factors for an MC. > > For me, the current MC proved that's fully deserving of this gentlemen's > agreement.
With the caveat that Thorsten must resign as MC-deputy, since one cannot be BoD and MC member at once. On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: >I have full trust in the current MC, no doubts about that. The issue that >makes me favor the other option (wait until the new MC is in place) is that it >would avoid having elections very soon after the legal set-up, which is rather >time consuming. Maybe we can do with the current MC as 'initially designated' for the first 6 month of the foundation and organize a MC election then, since it would be a good idea to have BoD election and MC election somewhat separated to avoid 'oversight'/'membership' issues. Norbert -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
