Hi Kendy, On 16/02/2022 09:52, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Paolo,Paolo Vecchi píše v Út 15. 02. 2022 v 17:09 +0100:And to conclude: the easiest way to convince me (and likely others) on the board that a proposal is a good idea - is to make your case properly with a well-researched writeup.Could you please forward to me the well researched write-up used to employ the new mentor so that I can use that as a template?The difference is that we already have a mentor (actually several mentors in several areas), while you suggest a strategic decision -
We recently employed only 1 mentor. No one else has been employed in that specific role.Are you able to forward to me the document where the case has been presented "with a well-researched writeup"?
which in my view deserves research, consideration from multiple views, listening to others & consensus.
We did the research in public, we had mostly 2 views, some have been listening to others and it would be great to recognise that there is a consensus that in-house developers are a desirable outcome which brings benefits to all.
It is sometimes not clear to me if the undefined objections to enabling TDF to be a more active contributors in areas not well covered by others are coming from members of TDF's board of directors or representatives of "the industry" which sells LibreOffice development services.
It would be great if members of the board of directors, with their TDF hat on, would explain clearly why they seem to be opposed to employing in-house developers.
All the best, Kendy
Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Deputy Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
