Hi, Andreas Mantke wrote on 14/03/2022 18:36:
and with the proposal the Android Viewer had to be put the attic and wouldn't currently get the chance to get out of this state (because only one developer looking for it).
Fair point. One could think of a way that the activity/nr of devs asked, has a relation with the initial project/project from the past.
Emiliano, Thorsten, what do you think?
I created two projects for TDF infra in 2011 (and two further in 2012 and 2013). If you'd ask for the same commitment to start / run this
so that's not the aim, as I explained.
projects as for de-attic a project, this projects wouldn't have been supported / used by TDF.
Cheers, Cor -- Cor Nouws, member Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 mobile : +31 (0)6 25 20 7001 skype : cornouws blog : cor4office-nl.blogspot.com jabber : cor4off...@jabber.org -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
