Hello, I agree with Mike to accept quickly a simplified online "local chapter Policy" adapted for many chapters as possible! = to avoid brakes and lost time! But in this case I think we can still simplify the current version (and OIDF accept the simplifications): e.g.: #6: just: " Chapters must agree that any intellectual property or trademarks developed or held by the Chapter must be freely available for use to the OpenID Community" #12! Delete " nation state level" Etc...
After (and I agree with Nat), I propose to accept an "agreement" (no really an Policy) between "National" chapters or "continental" Foundations... This agreement will mention all answers like translation, trademark, national position... The criteria will be examined depending the serious of this organization (IMO the list of members is the better proof) David, Dick, Nat, Drummond... agree with that? Cheers -Snorri -----Message d'origine----- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Nat Sakimura Envoyé : jeudi 8 mai 2008 08:58 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: [OpenID board] Revised local chapters policy Hi. * * Dick Hardt wrote: > On 8-May-08, at 8:14 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > > >> Hi Dick, >> >> In this respect, it comes down to the National Chapter governance >> structure, just same as for OIDF itself. >> > > exactly > > >> If the governance of the National Chapter is done democratically and >> openly, then those that are not happy with then current administration >> should be able to pursuade other members and correct the situation. >> > > potentially :) > > >> At the same time, the organization must have the administrative >> capability, since otherwise, even if the decision made by the >> organization is sound, it cannot be executed. >> >> So, in essence, we should >> 1) just define what is an appropreate governance structure for this >> purpose, >> 2) define what is an appropreate admnistrative capability >> and use these as the certification criteria. >> >> Actually, the same applies to OIDF itself. >> >> The content of 1) and 2) above needs more discussion, I think, in >> the WG >> level just like Mike indicated. I do not think Local Chapters policy >> needs to wait for the completion of such. >> > > So will the OIDF need to review and approve the governance structure > for each national chapter? > Essentially, yes, but there will not be too many as it will be first come first served bases then :-) > I understand and agree the problem can be solved -- the local chapter > proposal has no process for solving the issue I have raised. What > would you suggest we add to the proposal so that the process for > approving a national chapter is not arbitrary? > Well, perhaps you could add at the end of article 12. so that it reads like: "OIDF will recognize at most one chapter as the designated national chapter in a nation-state at any time according to the National Chapters Policy." -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. XDI.ORG Vice Chair _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
