Yes, I don't disagree with posting on the OpenID blog, just am disappointed that the time wasn't taken to write a blog post that would have the appeal of the blog's readership.
--- Sent from my iPhone Classic. On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:28 AM, "Martin Atkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Jones wrote: >> The relevant language in the IPR Procedures document is: >> · Prominent posting (at least 14 days in advance of the be >> ginning of the voting period) on homepage of OIDF website (but sol >> ely for votes to approve Implementers’ Drafts, Final Specification >> s, and Errata) >> No, upon re-reading, it doesn’t literally say that notification of >> the review period must also occur via the home page, but given th >> at the “prominent posting” of the vote is required to be on the >> home page, it’s also reasonable to interpret the intent of the pro >> cedures to assume that the review period notification should be ju >> st as prominent as the voting notification, which follows it. > > Note also that it mentions the "*OIDF* website", not the OpenID > website. I'm not sure what constitutes the OIDF website, though. Is > it openid.net/foundation ? > > With that said, I don't think there's really much harm in this going > on openid.net where it will have more visibility to those who might > like to join OIDF in order to take part in this review / vote. > _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
