Well, actually, I do not think we need to wait. This is the discussion period before the voting (1 week?).
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I will wait on putting any of the 4 proposals into the voting tool > until the day before the election. Please send me the final versions of > each of your motions by next Thursday. > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* Nat Sakimura [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2009 9:57 PM > > *To:* Brian Kissel > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > Yes. > > The fourth one was modified as par discussion with David, though I also > want to hear what other people feels like. > > =nat > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, so the first 3 were correct as stated? > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* Nat Sakimura [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2009 9:50 PM > *To:* Brian Kissel > *Cc:* [email protected] > > > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > Yes. Preferably, not wiki (because it's a bit too easy to edit...) but > something like bbs with voting facility :-) > > Anyhow, here is my modified motion 4. > > *BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have agreed to > amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft may claim OpenID > trademark until it is ratified to be a specification.* > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed, the wiki or something like it would be a better way to keep the > proposal and discussion in one organized space. Nat, what do you think? > > > Cheers, > > Brian > ============== > Brian Kissel > Cell: 503.866.4424 > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Chris Messina > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's 4 spec process improvement motions > > Would be great if Nat would add this to the wiki -- if only to try out > such a process and determine whether it works or not. I fear that > we're losing a lot of context/detail/accuracy by posting these kinds > of communications in multi-threaded emails. > > Chris > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nat, is there a more current version than this? The actual text of your > proposal, which I took from your email, was the text I was intending to put > into the board polling tool. > > > > If there is a more current version, please send it to me. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > ============== > > Brian Kissel > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of David Recordon > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:36 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec > process improvement motions > > > > Hey Brian, > > I don't believe this captures the latest motions that Nat made. > > > > --David > > > > On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Brian Kissel wrote: > > > >> When: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:00 AM-6:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific > >> Time (US & Canada). > >> > >> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > >> > >> FYI, this is a reminder that the online vote for Nat's four motions > >> will start on Friday Jan 23rd. > >> > >> Followings are the proposed motions that I would like the board to > >> consider. There are two types: one that can take effect immediately, > >> and one that requires board and membership voting. > >> > >> I. For immediate implementation of the current process: > >> > >> One of the obstacles that we have found during the process was that > >> it was kind of hard to get the specs council to deliver the > >> recommendation in a timely fashion. It has seen some improvement > >> recently, but we want to make sure to continue it. Thus, I would > >> like to propose the following: > >> > >> BE IT RESOLVED that the OIDF Committee Liason is directed to act as > >> the coordinator for the specification council so that specification > >> council create a recommendation for the membership about a formal > >> working group proposal within 15 days of the complete proposal being > >> circulated on [email protected] to comply to the current OpenID > >> process. > >> II. Improvements of curent porcess > >> > >> As a longer term solution, I would like to propose the following > >> three motions. The first two are to make sure the timely and > >> effective response from the specs council, and the last one is to > >> protect the OpenID(TM) as well as to make it easier to create a WG > >> so that all the discussion will be done inside the WG and the output > >> is IPR clean. > >> > >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should the > >> specifications council not create a recommendation for the > >> membership about a formal working group proposal within 15 days of > >> the complete proposal being circulated on [email protected], then the > >> proposal may proceed to a membership vote for approval. > >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should specs > >> council members not participate in the discussion of two consecutive > >> working group proposals, they will be deemed to have resigned, and > >> new specs council members who are committed to participating in the > >> process will be appointed to replace them. > >> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >> agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft > >> may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be an > >> implementor's draft status or full specification status. > >> > >> <mime-attachment.ics>_______________________________________________ > >> board-private mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private > > > > _______________________________________________ > > board-private mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > board mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Citizen-Participant & > Open Web Advocate-at-Large > > factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org > citizenagency.com # vidoop.com > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
