Wow Thanks! Chris. =nat
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Chris Messina <[email protected]>wrote: > I've gone ahead and filled out the template that I created just to see > if this kind of page would be helpful for such a vote: > > https://openid.pbwiki.com/Vote%3A-Spec-Process-Improvement > > Feedback/tweaks are of course welcome. > > Chris > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, this is the discussion period. The vote will start next Friday and > be > > open for a week or until we have the required number of votes to approve > or > > reject the motions. If the motions get modified during the discussion > > period, I will upload the final versions into the voting tool. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > > > ============== > > > > Brian Kissel > > > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > > > From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 10:05 PM > > To: Brian Kissel > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's > > 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > > > > > Well, actually, I do not think we need to wait. > > > > This is the discussion period before the voting (1 week?). > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > OK, I will wait on putting any of the 4 proposals into the voting tool > until > > the day before the election. Please send me the final versions of each > of > > your motions by next Thursday. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > > > ============== > > > > Brian Kissel > > > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > > > From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:57 PM > > > > To: Brian Kissel > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's > > 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > The fourth one was modified as par discussion with David, though I also > want > > to hear what other people feels like. > > > > =nat > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > OK, so the first 3 were correct as stated? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > > > ============== > > > > Brian Kissel > > > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > > > From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:50 PM > > To: Brian Kissel > > Cc: [email protected] > > > > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's > > 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > > > > > Yes. Preferably, not wiki (because it's a bit too easy to edit...) but > > something like bbs with voting facility :-) > > > > Anyhow, here is my modified motion 4. > > > > BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have agreed to > > amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft may claim > OpenID > > trademark until it is ratified to be a specification. > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Agreed, the wiki or something like it would be a better way to keep the > > proposal and discussion in one organized space. Nat, what do you think? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brian > > ============== > > Brian Kissel > > Cell: 503.866.4424 > > Fax: 503.296.5502 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf > > Of Chris Messina > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:43 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [OpenID board] [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on > Nat's > > 4 spec process improvement motions > > > > Would be great if Nat would add this to the wiki -- if only to try out > > such a process and determine whether it works or not. I fear that > > we're losing a lot of context/detail/accuracy by posting these kinds > > of communications in multi-threaded emails. > > > > Chris > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Brian Kissel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Nat, is there a more current version than this? The actual text of your > >> proposal, which I took from your email, was the text I was intending to > put > >> into the board polling tool. > >> > >> If there is a more current version, please send it to me. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Brian > >> ============== > >> Brian Kissel > >> Cell: 503.866.4424 > >> Fax: 503.296.5502 > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] > >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Recordon > >> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 3:36 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [board-private] Reminder: OIDF BOD vote on Nat's 4 spec > >> process improvement motions > >> > >> Hey Brian, > >> I don't believe this captures the latest motions that Nat made. > >> > >> --David > >> > >> On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Brian Kissel wrote: > >> > >>> When: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:00 AM-6:30 AM (GMT-08:00) Pacific > >>> Time (US & Canada). > >>> > >>> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > >>> > >>> FYI, this is a reminder that the online vote for Nat's four motions > >>> will start on Friday Jan 23rd. > >>> > >>> Followings are the proposed motions that I would like the board to > >>> consider. There are two types: one that can take effect immediately, > >>> and one that requires board and membership voting. > >>> > >>> I. For immediate implementation of the current process: > >>> > >>> One of the obstacles that we have found during the process was that > >>> it was kind of hard to get the specs council to deliver the > >>> recommendation in a timely fashion. It has seen some improvement > >>> recently, but we want to make sure to continue it. Thus, I would > >>> like to propose the following: > >>> > >>> BE IT RESOLVED that the OIDF Committee Liason is directed to act as > >>> the coordinator for the specification council so that specification > >>> council create a recommendation for the membership about a formal > >>> working group proposal within 15 days of the complete proposal being > >>> circulated on [email protected] to comply to the current OpenID > >>> process. > >>> II. Improvements of curent porcess > >>> > >>> As a longer term solution, I would like to propose the following > >>> three motions. The first two are to make sure the timely and > >>> effective response from the specs council, and the last one is to > >>> protect the OpenID(TM) as well as to make it easier to create a WG > >>> so that all the discussion will be done inside the WG and the output > >>> is IPR clean. > >>> > >>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should the > >>> specifications council not create a recommendation for the > >>> membership about a formal working group proposal within 15 days of > >>> the complete proposal being circulated on [email protected], then the > >>> proposal may proceed to a membership vote for approval. > >>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document so that should specs > >>> council members not participate in the discussion of two consecutive > >>> working group proposals, they will be deemed to have resigned, and > >>> new specs council members who are committed to participating in the > >>> process will be appointed to replace them. > >>> BE IT RESOLVED that the members of OpenID Foundation board have > >>> agreed to amend the OpenID process document to clarify that no draft > >>> may claim OpenID trademark until it is ratified to be an > >>> implementor's draft status or full specification status. > >>> > >>> <mime-attachment.ics>_______________________________________________ > >>> board-private mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> board-private mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board-private > >> > >> > >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > >> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > >> > >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > >> > >> http://www.eset.com > >> > >> > >> > >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > >> signature database 3772 (20090116) __________ > >> > >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > >> > >> http://www.eset.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> board mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Chris Messina > > Citizen-Participant & > > Open Web Advocate-at-Large > > > > factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org > > citizenagency.com # vidoop.com > > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > > _______________________________________________ > > board mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > > database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature > > database 3772 (20090116) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > -- > > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > > > > > -- > > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > > > > > -- > > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > board mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Citizen-Participant & > Open Web Advocate-at-Large > > factoryjoe.com # diso-project.org > citizenagency.com # vidoop.com > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
