Yes, I am opposed. The notification must include the precise proposed text
changes to the IPR documents, preferably as tracked changes to the approved
originals, so the lawyers know exactly what changes are being considered to our
IPR policy and process. Until those precise changes are drafted and available,
we can not start the 21-day legal review process.
-- Mike
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Brian Kissel
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 7:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - results
are in
Given that we need a 21 day notification for a membership vote, I'd suggest we
start that official notification now. Anyone opposed to that?
Nat, can you create the posting for the home page of the OIDF website, which is
also required?
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Nat Sakimura
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:58 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - results
are in
Hmmm. While this option sounds attractive, we might want to take two phased
approach.
I have just made motions for the urgent things. If we start requirement
gathering at this stage, it will delay these changes.
So, my proposal is to do what the board vote approved in parallel to the longer
term ammendment with requirement gatherings. (BTW, there are bunch of things
that I want to list under this mid-term project.)
I will draft the ammendment to the Process document this weekend.
One of the motion is unrelated to the Process document, but to assign the
committee liaison the power to take an initiative to facilitate and advance the
specs process. i.e., David is now officially empowered to chase down the specs
council members as well as to help out the proposers so that the process goes
as quick as it can.
I have not seen much progress on OpenID+OAuth hybrid and CX specs council
process. I hope this will improve the situation.
=nat
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:10 AM, David Recordon
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Given that there are some other things we'd like to amend to the IPR Process,
should we try to capture the entire list of changes we wish to make so we only
need to do this once?
On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Brian Kissel wrote:
OK thanks Mike. Do we have a "members" email address to start the membership
notification period?
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - results
are in
We can not amend the process doc without a membership vote, and the following
criteria being met, as per section 3.4 of the process:
* 21 day notice period
* Multiple electronic notice required (if the OIDF member has provided
multiple addresses), including to a "legal contact," if provided
* Prominent posting (at least 21 days in advance of the beginning of
the voting period) on homepage of OIDF website
* 7 day voting period after end of notice period (if vote is not taken
at a properly-noticed meeting)
* OIDF members may designate a proxy from the member's registered
OpenID identifier specifying the designated proxy's OpenID identifier
* Any approved change is prospective only
* Approval of a change requires either of the following:
Approval Option 1
o Quorum of greater of 60% of OIDF membership or 30 OIDF members (no bypass
option) and
o Supermajority vote of those constituting a quorum, plus a majority
concurrence by the OIDF Board
Approval Option 2
o Quorum of greater of 30% of OIDF membership or 30 OIDF members (no bypass
option) and
o Majority vote of those constituting a quorum, plus a supermajority
concurrence by the entire OIDF Board (where "absents" and "abstains" count as
"no" votes)
Any change to the IPR Policy or Processes will not be effective until 21 days
after approval, during which time then-current Contributors may withdraw in
accordance with the IPR Policy or Processes as they existed prior to the change
Nat could produce an updated draft of the doc (which should have tracked
changes on relative to the approved version) for legal membership review prior
to the vote, but none of this can go into effect until the membership vote has
occurred and met the criteria above.
-- Mike
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Kissel
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:29 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - results
are in
Thanks to everyone for your timely voting. While the polls are still open, all
4 of the motions made by Nat have passed. Nat can you take care of modifying
the OpenID process document?
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: Brian Kissel
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:24 PM
To: '[email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]>'
Subject: RE: 4 spec process improvement board votes - please go to the website
and vote
Hello All, just a reminder to go to the website and vote on these 4 motions.
To date we only have 5 votes and we need 7 for a majority decision.
Cheers,
Brian
==============
Brian Kissel
Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
From: Brian Kissel
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 1:16 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: 4 spec process improvement board votes
Hello OIDF board members,
The four spec process improvement motions made by Nat Sakimura and seconded by
Brian Kissel have now completed the seven day notification and discussion
period. Each motion is now available for board voting on the OIDF polling
tool. A simple majority vote by 7 or more board members is required for
approval on each motion. The vote ends on January 31st, 2009.
Regards,
Brian
___________
Brian Kissel<http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/10/254>
CEO, JanRain - OpenID-enable your websites, customers, partners, and employees
5331 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 375, Portland, OR 97239
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cell: 503.866.4424
Fax: 503.296.5502
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3796 (20090124) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3805 (20090127) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3805 (20090127) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3811 (20090129) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3811 (20090129) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
