I will make a first draft based on the web copy over the weekend. =nat
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes, I am opposed. The notification must include the precise proposed > text changes to the IPR documents, preferably as tracked changes to the > approved originals, so the lawyers know exactly what changes are being > considered to our IPR policy and process. Until those precise changes are > drafted and available, we can not start the 21-day legal review process. > > > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Brian Kissel > *Sent:* Thursday, January 29, 2009 7:15 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - > results are in > > > > Given that we need a 21 day notification for a membership vote, I'd suggest > we start that official notification now. Anyone opposed to that? > > > > Nat, can you create the posting for the home page of the OIDF website, > which is also required? > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura > *Sent:* Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:58 PM > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - > results are in > > > > Hmmm. While this option sounds attractive, we might want to take two phased > approach. > I have just made motions for the urgent things. If we start requirement > gathering at this stage, it will delay these changes. > > So, my proposal is to do what the board vote approved in parallel to the > longer term ammendment with requirement gatherings. (BTW, there are bunch of > things that I want to list under this mid-term project.) > > I will draft the ammendment to the Process document this weekend. > > One of the motion is unrelated to the Process document, but to assign the > committee liaison the power to take an initiative to facilitate and advance > the specs process. i.e., David is now officially empowered to chase down the > specs council members as well as to help out the proposers so that the > process goes as quick as it can. > > I have not seen much progress on OpenID+OAuth hybrid and CX specs council > process. I hope this will improve the situation. > > =nat > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:10 AM, David Recordon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Given that there are some other things we'd like to amend to the IPR > Process, should we try to capture the entire list of changes we wish to make > so we only need to do this once? > > > > > > On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Brian Kissel wrote: > > > > OK thanks Mike. Do we have a "members" email address to start the > membership notification period? > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > ] *On Behalf Of *Mike Jones > *Sent:* Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:55 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - > results are in > > > > We can not amend the process doc without a membership vote, and the > following criteria being met, as per section 3.4 of the process: > > > > · 21 day notice period > > · Multiple electronic notice required (if the OIDF member has > provided multiple addresses), including to a "legal contact," if provided > > · Prominent posting (at least 21 days in advance of the beginning > of the voting period) on homepage of OIDF website > > · 7 day voting period after end of notice period (if vote is not > taken at a properly-noticed meeting) > > · OIDF members may designate a proxy from the member's registered > OpenID identifier specifying the designated proxy's OpenID identifier > > · Any approved change is prospective only > > · Approval of a change requires *either* of the following: > > *Approval Option 1* > > o Quorum of greater of 60% of OIDF membership or 30 OIDF members (*no > bypass option*) *and* > > o Supermajority vote of those constituting a quorum, plus a majority > concurrence by the OIDF Board > > *Approval Option 2* > > o Quorum of greater of 30% of OIDF membership or 30 OIDF members (*no > bypass option*) *and* > > o Majority vote of those constituting a quorum, plus a supermajority > concurrence by the entire OIDF Board (where "absents" and "abstains" count > as "no" votes) > > Any change to the IPR Policy or Processes will not be effective until 21 > days after approval, during which time then-current Contributors may > withdraw in accordance with the IPR Policy or Processes as they existed > prior to the change > > > > Nat could produce an updated draft of the doc (which should have tracked > changes on relative to the approved version) for legal membership review > prior to the vote, but none of this can go into effect until the membership > vote has occurred and met the criteria above. > > > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > ] *On Behalf Of *Brian Kissel > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [OpenID board] 4 spec process improvement board votes - > results are in > > > > Thanks to everyone for your timely voting. While the polls are still open, > all 4 of the motions made by Nat have passed. Nat can you take care of > modifying the OpenID process document? > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* Brian Kissel > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 27, 2009 7:24 PM > *To:* '[email protected] <%[email protected]>' > *Subject:* RE: 4 spec process improvement board votes - please go to the > website and vote > > > > Hello All, just a reminder to go to the website and vote on these 4 > motions. To date we only have 5 votes and we need 7 for a majority > decision. > > > > Cheers, > > > Brian > > *==============* > > *Brian Kissel* > > *Cell: 503.866.4424* > > *Fax: 503.296.5502* > > > > *From:* Brian Kissel > *Sent:* Saturday, January 24, 2009 1:16 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* 4 spec process improvement board votes > > > > Hello OIDF board members, > > > > The four spec process improvement motions made by Nat Sakimura and seconded > by Brian Kissel have now completed the seven day notification and discussion > period. Each motion is now available for board voting on the OIDF polling > tool. A simple majority vote by 7 or more board members is required for > approval on each motion. The vote ends on January 31st, 2009. > > > > Regards, > > > Brian > > *___________* > > * * > > *Brian Kissel <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/10/254>* > > *CEO, JanRain - **OpenID-enable your websites, customers, partners, and > employees* > > 5331 SW Macadam Ave., Suite 375, Portland, OR 97239 > > *Email*: [email protected] *Cell*: 503.866.4424 *Fax*: > 503.296.5502 > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3796 (20090124) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3805 (20090127) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3805 (20090127) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3811 (20090129) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > > > > -- > Nat Sakimura (=nat) > http://www.sakimura.org/en/ > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 3811 (20090129) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
