> So, the argument against my idea is that the validator catches all > errors through redundancy ... yet we are whittling away at the scope and > intensity of redundancy all the time... so, ipso facto more errors are > going to not be caught. Ok, I will not touch area w/o redundancy. I just consider that bad practice personally (not to implement redundancy on at elast level 2 results per each task). Maybe some more strong ones in statistics could go in this area. So no objections to _any_ approach in this area :)
_______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
