On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:54 AM, blues <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 5, 4:39 pm, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:08 AM, blues <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > i also added an example at that page of a problem i am having: >> >> > //Page last updated on// >> > //[(time {(lastmodified)} "%d %b %Y, %H:%M:%S")] // >> >> > inserts both a <br/> and a <p> between the two lines. >> >> I'm not sure this is a bug. It seems perfectly expected. Any line >> followed by a single line break gets a <br /> added to the end of the >> line. Any line followed by two line returns gets wrapped in <p> tags. > > knowing this rules, now i understand the behavior. > though, it is obviously not correct. > the <p> should wrap the paragraph and not the line. and since <br/> > does not break the paragraph, the opening <p> should be at the > beginning. > > eg: > > first line > second line > third line > > fourth line > fifth line > > those are obviously two paragraphs. why "third line" should be wrapped > in a <p>? > any idea?
I'm glad the rules explain things. But I disagree that it is "obviously" incorrect. The example above does not at all look like two paragraphs to me. As paragraphs do not have line breaks in them. Maybe poetry or something. I think BoltWire is more in the mainstream on this, in light of wiki creole at least. Though we do not require an ending // to signify paragraphs--still the markup specifications says paragraphs should be followed by two line returns. Cheers, Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
