Interesting. I'm not familiar with this standard. It seems to be another way to handle the issue solved by the viewport meta tag, which I believe is html4. Probably our default mobile skin should use both tags just to be safe. I'll double check it doesn't cause problems to use BOTH tags simultaneously.
Both of your sites looked the same on my desktop, but on my ipod the difference was definitely significant. Thanks for the info! I am curious though if the BoltWire mobile skin worked for you without the doctype? That is, when viewed on your mobile device, did it show the sidebar, or not? Because it is php generated, it may work fine with or without. Please look at this link to make sure it says CONDITIONAL: Mobile (not Stuck) to make sure you are getting the mobile skin first. http://www.boltwire.com/index.php?p=test.mobile Cheers, Dan On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem that I've had with doing mobile web pages is that the doctype > needs to be correct for the phone to view it properly. For example: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD XHTML Mobile 1.0//EN" > "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/xhtml-mobile10.dtd";> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
