[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13242646#comment-13242646
]
Aniruddha commented on BOOKKEEPER-197:
--------------------------------------
What would be a good resolution for this? Currently, by just merging the two
files into one, I am able to get the desired behavior. But it feels more like a
hack than a solution. My use-case is connecting to a hedwig server where
zookeeper is running on a remote machine. The current setup doesn't pick up the
zookeeper location.
Another thing that could be done is have a separate configuration file
(HEDWIG_CONSOLE_CONF perhaps) altogether and pass that as an option in the
shell script bin/hedwig.
> HedwigConsole uses the same file to load bookkeeper client config and hub
> server config
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-197
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: hedwig-server
> Affects Versions: 4.1.0
> Reporter: Aniruddha
> Priority: Minor
>
> In the current implementation of HedwigConsole.java, The same server-cfg file
> (default = hedwig-server/conf/hw_server.conf) is used to load both
> hubServerConf and bkClientConf. This seems incorrect because both have
> different option names.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
