On 7/2/07, Scott McMurray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02/07/07, Matias Capeletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can we use: 07-07-01 ? > > I do not think the news will be news in 100 years from now ;) > > > I prefer 4-digit years, personally. The extra "cost" is minimal, and > it makes it much easier to realize which notation is in use.
This argument was what I need. Thanks! I will change them. They have been change. Do you guys think that the version of the packages are wrong to. We are using: boost_docs_07_07_01 I find boost_docs_2007_07_01 a little verbose. Regards Matias ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
