On 02/07/07, Matias Capeletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you guys think that the version of the packages are wrong to. > > We are using: > boost_docs_07_07_01 > > I find > boost_docs_2007_07_01 > a little verbose. >
> On 7/2/07, Scott McMurray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I prefer 4-digit years, personally. Another option might be boost_docs_20070701, which is ISO-compliant, though compliance there is really not important. It does keep the full year I like while not being longer than the current one, but it does lose a bit of readability. ~ Scott P.S. I just noticed that our clients are using locales with different date formats, a nice indication that this ISO 8601 stuff really is a good idea ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
