> What I was wondering about was whether the test machine (not mine, I'm > still under MacOS 9.2.2 using CodeWarrior) had its headers properly configured. > > The released version has BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION > defined for that compiler, but the main trunk version behaves as though > such is not the case. Ergo, either it was found it should not have been > defined, and the "#define" has been deleted between the release version > and the main trunk, or the merging of the release trunk into the main > trunk left out part of the config headers. Or I missed something...
Hubert, your code does not include <boost/config.hpp> so no boost macros will ever be set will they? And yes the macros should be all set correctly - the config test cases are all passing. John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
