Somewhere in the E.U., le 15/11/2002 Bonjour
Something odd is going on... My code does include <boost/config.hpp> (on line 16 for both quaternion_test.cpp and octonion_test.cpp, on line 13 for quaternion_mi_test.cpp, though admitedly not yet for quaternion_mi1.cpp, quaternion_mi2.cpp and HSO3SO4.cpp... I'll fix that right now). I checked both my local copy and the (browser-visible) CVS copy. Anyway, we should probably not loose to much sleep over that issue, as a few other problems have been pointed out to me, so I am preparing another batch of fixes. A bientot Hubert Holin [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Maddock wrote: > > > What I was wondering about was whether the test machine (not mine, I'm > > still under MacOS 9.2.2 using CodeWarrior) had its headers properly > configured. > > > > The released version has BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION > > defined for that compiler, but the main trunk version behaves as though > > such is not the case. Ergo, either it was found it should not have been > > defined, and the "#define" has been deleted between the release version > > and the main trunk, or the merging of the release trunk into the main > > trunk left out part of the config headers. Or I missed something... > > Hubert, your code does not include <boost/config.hpp> so no boost macros > will ever be set will they? > > And yes the macros should be all set correctly - the config test cases are > all passing. > > John Maddock > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost