Matthias Troyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 05:43 AM, David Abrahams wrote: >> >> Does anybody else feel they need more time to give this library a >> thorough going-over? I think we could afford to extend the review for >> a few more days. I would especially be willing to do so if it would >> allow for enough discussion for someone like Jeff to make a definitive >> vote, since he has experience in the domain. > > Yes, it would also help me to try get the code working under gcc v. 3 and to really >test the library, > as well as to try provide some extra binary formats (e.g. XDR or PVM formats) in >order to see if it > works well. > > Could we extend it by one week so that we have another weekend?
Thomas Witt is the Boost Review Wizard. It's up to him. Thomas? [BTW, Thomas, can we put your name and an email link at http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_process.htm#Wizard? I actually forgot it was you and had to look through the email archives to find out!] -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost