> From: "Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Anyway, my conclusion is there is nothing preventing using > > serialization for XML other than the time and energy to do > > it. > > As I already said, my experience is that this theory sometimes proves wrong.
I understand. And I would like to see a more complete evaluation of this issue. However, this thread started b/c of 2 posts that from Robert and Matthias that led me to believe there was something about the design that would prevent extending to XML. I was curious b/c I hadn't seen anything that was a blocker. After further discussion it appears I over extended their comments. So I am back to where I started -- I currently don't see a reason that the library design prevents extensions for XML formats -- doesn't mean that it is guaranteed, just that it isn't obviously broken. Jeff _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
