----- Original Message ----- From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Do we need a boost_exception class or idiom?
> "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> 2. Why are we reinventing the wheel? What's wrong with > >> boost::throw_exception() from boost/throw_exception.hpp? > >> > > Nothing :-) > > I like this approach... and I had forgot about it. > > Anyway, I was just pointing out that IIF a boost exception class was defined > > it should throw itself. > > Why should it? That seems to imply that there /is/ something wrong > with the boost::throw_exception approach. > True, and I take it back, because not only there is nothing wrong with boost::throw_exception , it also does the same job (as ::raise()) quite better. Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
