Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 07 December 2002 06:47 am, John Maddock wrote: >> Maybe we need something new for those folks: something like >> BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever, that disables all compiler workarounds? >> To keep things centralised BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS should be defined by the >> compiler config when the compilers version is greater than the last known >> version and BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG is set, then boost workaround-code need >> only check for the presence of BOOST_NO_WORKAROUNDS or whatever in addition >> to the compiler version. >> >> How does this sound? >> >> John Maddock >> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm > > I like it.
I don't (yet). Why do we need yet another macro which means "turn off the workarounds?" Would BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG then be obsolete? Maybe I just don't understand the proposal, and code would help. Can you show us a rewrite of boost/detail/workaround.hpp that would correspond to what you're proposing? -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost