From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I like it. > > I don't (yet). Why do we need yet another macro which means "turn off > the workarounds?" Would BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG then be obsolete?
I think that the idea is that BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG applies only to unknown compiler versions, and BOOST_DISABLE_WORKAROUNDS (do we need separate compiler/library macros?) would be applied unconditionally, regardless of whether the compiler has known defects. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
