given the Standard's wording in 3.9/1: "... There are two kinds of types: fundamental types and compound types. ..."
isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we just change it to basically match: is_compound = !is_fundamental given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other stuff required for the current version. Regards, Daniel ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think you may be on to something, I'll try it out when I have a chance, thanks! John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
