isn't the current implementation of is_compound overly complex? Can't we
just change it to basically match:
is_compound = !is_fundamental
given a working version of is_fundamental of course, but this seems
easier than providing an always safe and portable is_class or other
stuff required for the current version.
Regards, Daniel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 06:59 AM, John Maddock wrote:
I think you may be on to something, I'll try it out when I have a chance,Fwiw, is_compound = !is_fundamental is how the Metrowerks version of this utility has been implemented for the last few years.
thanks!
-Howard
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
