Terje Slettebų wrote:
> I guess this is another good argument for class template
> overloading. Does anyone know if this has been "formally"
> proposed for C0x?
AFAIK, no.
> A quick search at Google Groups turned up nothing.
>
> With it, you might have used:
>
> template<>
> struct plus<default_type, default_type>
> {
> template<class T1, class T2, class T3, class T4, class T5>
> struct apply { ... }
>
> template<class Sequence>
> struct apply { ... }
> };
>
Yes, except that I don't want to place a burden of supporting both forms on
a metafunction author. It's 'apply_tuple' that is supposed to take care of
arguments unfolding and passing them on, separately, to the metafunction
being invoked.
> And what about partial specialisation of function templates?
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2001/n1295.htm
> Could there be a good chance to get that, as well? I guess these things
> depend much on somebody writing a formal proposal. :)
In particular.
Aleksey
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
