>From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > With it, you might have used:
> >
> > template<>
> > struct plus<default_type, default_type>
> > {
> > template<class T1, class T2, class T3, class T4, class T5>
> > struct apply { ... }
> >
> > template<class Sequence>
> > struct apply { ... }
> > };
> >
>
> Yes, except that I don't want to place a burden of supporting both forms
on
> a metafunction author. It's 'apply_tuple' that is supposed to take care of
> arguments unfolding and passing them on, separately, to the metafunction
> being invoked.
Yes, that makes sense.
> > And what about partial specialisation of function templates?
>
> http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2001/n1295.htm
Thanks. :) Come to think of it, I think I've read that proposal earlier.
Regards,
Terje
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
