David B. Held wrote: > "Hartmut Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > 000f01c2b691$45a3a1a0$0b00a8c0@fortytwo">news:000f01c2b691$45a3a1a0$0b00a8c0@fortytwo... > > Terje Slettebų wrote: > > > [...] > > > typedef char (&yes_type)[1]; > > > typedef char (&no_type)[2]; > > > > Within the Boost.Spirit library we have the need to have not only > > two distinct (size-)types, but something around a dozen. Wouldn't it > > be better to provide something more general as the two (size-)type > > yes/no solution? With Boost.PP this shouldn't be any problem. > > You mean like: > > template <int N> struct size_type { char s[N]; }; > > typedef size_type<1> false_t; > typedef size_type<2> true_t; > typedef size_type<3> some_other_t; > ...
Yes. Sorry for beeing too inconsise. Regards Hartmut _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
