----- Original Message ----- From: "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Re: Small thing: yes_type and no_type made public?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmut Kaiser) writes: > > > > > // The following expands to > > // > > // typedef char (&sizeN_t)[N]; > > // > > // for N = 1..BOOST_MAX_SIZETYPE_COUNT > > #define SIZETYPE(z, n, nil) \ > > typedef char (&size ## n ## _t)[n]; \ > > /**/ > > Careful; isn't the symbol "_t" reserved to the implementation in this context? I thought it was only if the underscore was followed by a capital letter, as in "_T". Paul Mensonides _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
